I don’t know if this is part of a new strategy where networks totally give up on young people, but that is what it seems like. We now have a series that tells us all about Will Graham’s first encounters with Hannibal Lecter (see above), Carrie Bradshaw’s high school years, and Norman Bates’ relationship with his mother, for heaven’s sake. These can only be appealing to people who have no imaginations and hate new things, because there’s a ton of great new stuff on television. Granted, it’s exclusively on cable, but it’s there—”Mad Men,” “The Walking Dead,” even totally inoffensive fare like “Cougar Town” and the USA dramas demonstrate genuine cerebral activity. “Suits” is surprisingly good; “Burn Notice” is great.
Are broadcast networks really that starved for good scripts? The only halfway decent thing I can even think of coming to broadcast in the fall is Joss Whedon’s “Shield” show (and I almost linked to IGN’s coverage of that, until I realized that I would rather saw my own leg off at the knee than link to the actual staffer-created content on IGN. “Reporter” actually describes Samuel L. Jackson as “a very busy, very important man”), and even that is spun off of a movie premise, and not officially greenlit yet.
In conclusion, go watch “Archer” or “Downton Abbey” or something, and try not to think about how your taxes pay for broadcasters to have free access to public airwaves.
COMMENTARY: Commercials Are Terrible
26 MarI am not opposed to advertising in order to create interesting art. This practice has a history as old as art itself, or at least as old as giving people a lot of money to paint and then asking that they maybe try to get your good side when they do a picture of you.
But I do not like commercial breaks. No indeed. And this is why I do not have cable television any longer. And it does not bother me one little bit. I have Netflix, and I have the internet, and by and large I don’t mind video or banner ads, but interrupting my viewing in order to try and sell me something for progressively longer periods of time just isn’t cricket, and it’s getting worse.
Commercial pods are getting longer, and networks are trying to drive live viewing with shorter and shorter TV seasons. That’s fine with me—my favorite shows are mostly on Amazon.com after a few hours and I’m more than happy to drop $2 per episode to catch them, because you know what? That is not nearly the price of a cable bill, and it’s all ad-free.
Cable services are expensive, finnicky, and suffer from some of the worst customer service in any medium. HBO produces crackerjack TV shows and it has no advertising revenue at all, so I think we can dispense with the “ads pay for your content” argument. I, world. I pay for my content. If I don’t like it, I stop paying. It’s that easy. All the McDonald’s ads in the world can’t make me go to McDonald’s; soon enough advertisers are going to figure that out and stop buying most of the shows I like altogether, and that will be fine with me, because they will still exist in some form, somewhere.
Anyway, HBO is thawing on the subject of a la carte service, and it would be nice if they came around. Also if I could buy my internet service from somebody who doesn’t also sell cable, because I suspect you can only get the good internet if you buy their too-expensive cable packages.
/rant
Tags: Advertising, commentary, culture, media, Rants